Drive customer adoption through shared KPIs for CS and Product

Shared KPIs for the product and the CS teams? The community discussed how cross-functional goal alignment can drive adoption.
February 2, 2023
Blog illustrator
Aswinchandar M

Having joint KPIs between customer success (CS) and product teams is crucial as it aligns both teams towards a common goal of driving customer adoption. This helps encourage cross-functional collaboration and communication, providing a clear understanding of the impact of product and customer success efforts. Joint KPIs track and measure the effectiveness of both teams' strategies and initiatives and provide insight into areas where both teams can work together to drive further adoption.

Aligning CS and product teams through joint KPIs ensures the following:

  • A better understanding of customer needs: By working together to track KPIs that drive customer adoption, both teams can gain a deeper understanding of customer needs and develop strategies to address them. `
  • Improved customer outcomes: Joint KPIs can help both teams focus on the key metrics that drive customer success and satisfaction, such as usage, retention, and renewals.
  • Data-driven decision-making: Joint KPIs provide both teams with data-driven insights into what's working and not, helping them make informed decisions and adjust their strategies as needed.
  • Improved accountability: Joint KPIs create a shared sense of accountability between teams, encouraging both to take ownership of customer success and drive better results.
  • Increased transparency: Joint KPIs increase transparency between teams, helping to avoid misunderstandings and misaligned goals.

A customer-focused culture and strategy leads to better decision-making, problem-solving, and, ultimately, customer satisfaction

Preflight Community discusses why joint KPIs for adoption are important and some measures that both the customer success and the product teams take to ensure they are aligned on these KPIs.

Gary Hoffman,  Customer Success Lead & GTM - Delino (LegalTech) @ Munich Re

My startup experience is that we get bought 2-3 years in, or shut down, so we don't get far on those shared goals. The problem is that often times the product is underway by the time someone arrives, and CS is something they expect our department to handle. This is why Intercom, Userflow, and many more products exist.

Ali Hardoon, Manager, Customer Success & Onboarding at Robin

Our teams are aligned in driving the adoption of core features tied to our customer health score (which has the acronym MIDAS). This stands for Maps, Insights, Desks, Active Users, and Spaces — since we are a workplace experience platform. The way our teams approach hitting these KPIs is obviously different, but we’re aligned on the same outcomes in terms of driving adoption.

Anya Palisch, Head of Implementation @ Pave

I've had joint OKRs/KPIs with Product at every company I've worked at! It makes me sad to hear that some teams cannot get this to work effectively because of all the outcomes it opens doors to otherwise. I think the failure to launch these programs often comes from a lack of leadership at the C-Suite that sees Product and CS as a cyclical set of teams:

  1. CS gives feedback to the product team
  2. Product releases product features to help the CS team
  3. CS and Product teams together drive the adoption of those features

It's really great to develop these around new feature work or unhealthy product areas. No R&D team wants to see something they built flop or die a slow death. Right now, at Pave, we're hyper-focused on using our compensation band management product.

Product and CS co-own a KPI that encourages customers to upload compensation information to our platform and then share it with the managers and recruiters at their company. Our target is that 80% of customers share a band with someone else at their company by the end of Q1!

Jeff Kushmerek, CEO and Founder @ Infinite Renewals

My opinion on this is that not only should the CS and Product team share joint KPIs, but the entire organization should have their OKRs and KPIs around retention. Until that happens, people will take the not in my backyard, or not my job approach to things. Anything from bugs to product requests to marketing, anything! Where I have seen the most success in getting higher retention is when the whole company has joint OKR/KPIs around retention.

In a recent episode of Implementation Stories Jennifer Chiang, Head of Customer Success at Seso, and author of The Startup’s Guide to Customer Success, shares with us what it takes for CS and product teams to work together successfully.

She emphasizes that a tight and empathetic partnership would mean understanding that both CS and Product are the same team, which can lead to increased transparency, improved shared context, lesser firefighting, and internal friction. Ultimately, this improves the operational efficiency of both teams.

In the session, Jennifer discussed the Five principles to help cultivate a strong CS-Product relationship. If you’d like to know more about how leaders like Jennifer Chiang foster better relationships between their product and the CS team, you can access it in text here, and if you prefer watching the recorded session, click here.

What initiatives have you started at your company to ensure positive CS and product team interactions?  As a manager, how do you ensure that your customer-facing teams are constantly motivated to maintain these relationships?

If you have ideas, suggestions, and questions you want to share with the larger customer onboarding, implementation, and CS community, we’d love to have you join Preflight Community and share it with our members!

Subcribe to Our
Newsletter

FAQs

What I appreciated most about Rocketlane is its seamless approach to onboarding and project management. The ability to collaborate in real-time, set clear timelines, and track progress across multiple teams makes it incredibly efficient. The built-in document-sharing and communication tools reduce the need to switch between platforms. It’s especially useful for client-facing projects, where transparency and accountability are key

Sebastian
Intercom

AI that executes your delivery work (Add to any plan)

Most popular

Standard

Ideal for expanding organizations needing more in-depth capabilities and integration for scaling.

$49

per team member/
month billed annually

*minimum of 5 team members

  • Full partner ecosystem support
  • Dynamic templates for any project
  • Milestone CSAT for customer pulse
  • Docs, forms, projects in one place
  • Docs, forms, projects in one place
  • Approval-governed time tracking
  • 200 Automations/user/month
  • Native HubSpot, Jira, Slack Integration

Most popular

Premium

Great for teams desiring tailored workflows with comprehensive reporting capabilities.

$69

per team member/month billed annually

*minimum of 5 team members

  • Real-time project profitability
  • AI resourcing and capacity planning
  • All revenue recognition models
  • Centralized rate cards and budgets
  • Portfolio reporting for leaders
  • Bill faster & improve cash flow
  • Native Salesforce integration

Most popular

Enterprise

Tailored for large enterprises requiring a fully customizable, comprehensive delivery engine.

$99

per team member/month billed annually

*minimum of 5 team members

  • SAML SSO and role-based access
  • Unlimited, hands-off automations
  • Soft-allocate pipeline deals early
  • Skills matrix for smarter staffing
  • Staff global teams ahead of demand
  • Multi-currency global delivery
  • Snowflake data + custom reports

Full reviews for all 11 tools below

<TL;DR>

A Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) embeds in the customer environment to implement, customize, and operationalize complex products. They unblock integrations, fix data issues, adapt workflows, and bridge engineering gaps — accelerating onboarding, adoption, and customer value far beyond traditional post-sales roles.

<TL;DR>

A Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) embeds in the customer environment to implement, customize, and operationalize complex products. They unblock integrations, fix data issues, adapt workflows, and bridge engineering gaps — accelerating onboarding, adoption, and customer value far beyond traditional post-sales roles.

Trusted by top companies

One platform does what the entire table above tries
to split across tools.

Myth

Enterprise implementations fail because customers don’t follow the process or provide clean data on time. Most delays are purely “customer-side” issues.

Fact

Implementations fail because complex environments need real-time technical problem-solving. FDEs unblock workflows, integrations, and unknown constraints that traditional onboarding teams can’t resolve on their own.

Get a better all-in-one PSA

Did you Know?

Companies that embed engineers directly with customers see significantly higher enterprise retention compared to traditional post-sales models — because embedded engineers uncover “unknowns” that never surface in ticket queues.

Sebastian mathew

VP Sales, Intercom

A Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) embeds in the customer environment to implement, customize, and operationalize complex products. They unblock integrations, fix data issues, adapt workflows, and bridge engineering gaps — accelerating onboarding, adoption, and customer value far beyond traditional post-sales roles.